KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd (MAHB) is suing low-cost carrier AirAsia Group Bhd and its long-haul affiliate AirAsia X Bhd (AAX) for a combined RM36.11 million for outstanding airport taxes.
This confirmed a report by The Edge Malaysia weekly on Dec 3 that in mid-October, MAHB sent legal letters to AirAsia and AAX demanding both airlines remit outstanding airport taxes or passenger service charges (PSCs) for international departures from July 1.
In a filing with Bursa Malaysia yesterday, AirAsia said MAHB’s subsidiary Malaysia Airports (Sepang) Sdn Bhd (MASSB) had filed a lawsuit against the airline’s wholly-owned unit AirAsia Bhd (AAB) seeking RM9.4 million for unpaid PSCs.
In a separate filing, AAX said it had also been served with a writ of summons of RM26.72 million by MASSB for PSC arrears.
Both AirAsia and AAX said they will defend these proceedings “vigorously” as they believe the claims were made “without justification and were unreasonable”.
The PSCs are paid by departing passengers and collected by the airlines upon purchases of tickets, and are later passed on to MAHB upon completion of the flights.
While the PSC rate has been set at RM73 per passenger from Jan 1 this year, both airlines have only been collecting RM50 per passenger. MAHB is now demanding that the airlines pay up the RM23 difference per passenger from July.
However, AirAsia said AAB had not collected, and refused to collect, from travelling passengers. AAX has done the same.
“MASSB insists that klia2 should charge the same rate as the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) (Main Terminal). We strongly believe and have so represented to MASSB numerous times that klia2 is a low-cost airport and the charges levied should reflect the level of services provided.
“We maintain that we are not obliged to collect the same PSC for passengers departing from klia2, and will not do so for the sake of all the stakeholders in the aviation and tourism industries,” said AirAsia and AAX.
In what is seen as a tit-for-tat response to MAHB’s lawsuit, the two airlines said they intend to pursue cross claims against the airport operator in relation to the infrastructure and state of the airport and its operations, which include major apron defects, random closures of runways, damage to aircraft and rupture of fuel pipelines.
“We believe these claims far exceed the claims MASSB is seeking. We have attempted — without success — on numerous occasions to engage MASSB on these issues but regrettably MASSB has decided to bring these issues to the public arena by commencing legal action,” they said.